It's standard practice - for obvious reasons - to identify the affiliations of those being interviewed on the media. 'Muslim Brotherhood spokesperson', 'Far-right activist' or whatever. Poor David Duke (on the odd occasion he gets on the MSM) gets tagged to this day with the 'ex-leader of the Ku Klux Klan' appellation even though he left that organisation over forty years ago. So why then should we not identify the ethnicity of Jews appearing on the media? 'Jewish journalist', Jewish Senator' etc.
You can just imagine the squawks and squeals of outrage such a proposal would elicit. Hitler and the Nazis would get yet another airing, another Holocau$t would be in the making. But why should this be? Why would they object to being identified as Jewish? In fact they revolt against the idea for the same reasons I support it. First it would highlight their staggering over-representation at the controlling heights of Western society. Second it would bring into sharp relief the fact that, despite internal disagreements about methods and means and bracing claims of universal moral pieties, they operate under a single criterion: 'Is it good for the Jews?'
At which point the nativists would start getting restless. Very restless.
As Josef Goebbels observed: One may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I've been found out."
You can just imagine the squawks and squeals of outrage such a proposal would elicit. Hitler and the Nazis would get yet another airing, another Holocau$t would be in the making. But why should this be? Why would they object to being identified as Jewish? In fact they revolt against the idea for the same reasons I support it. First it would highlight their staggering over-representation at the controlling heights of Western society. Second it would bring into sharp relief the fact that, despite internal disagreements about methods and means and bracing claims of universal moral pieties, they operate under a single criterion: 'Is it good for the Jews?'
At which point the nativists would start getting restless. Very restless.
As Josef Goebbels observed: One may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I've been found out."