I see that there have been mass walkouts from schools throughout America in protest against gun violence. According to Vox the students want to 'deliver a simple message: Reducing gun violence is about more than stopping mass shootings in schools. It’s also about addressing how violence affects communities of color'. Are we to assume from this that gun violence is ok if the victims are White? In any event they're 'now calling for an end to gun violence through a comprehensive program that addresses youth unemployment, mental health services, and improved school resources'. In other words a few more billions handed over by Whitey to 'community organisers' to.....well, whatever they do I'm sure every last cent will be rigorously accounted for.So let's take a minute to show that the gun control project is unsupported by either fact or logic and examine why it nonetheless attracts such support from our overlords.
Consider:
Bad guys can always acquire a gun. Would-be murderers or terrorists can always get hold a gun or if not a weapon equally lethal. This applies especially in the USA where existing circumstances (hundreds of millions of guns in existence and Latin America lying across a porous border) render it impossible to disarm gang-bangers or terrorists.
Bad guys will ignore gun-free zone warnings. In the name of Jesus it should not be necessary to point this out but many otherwise normal people profess to think that sticking up a sign will stop would-be mass murderers. Can you just imagine Nikolas Cruz seeing that sign at the Broward school turning on his heel muttering 'damn it, must find some other kind of weaponry!'. It'd be comical were not lives as stake.
The ownership/murder ratio does not hold up. The ratio of gun ownership does not correlate at all with the ratio of murders. For instance Norway, Canada and Switzerland lag only slightly behind the USA in the gun ownership ratio but the gun death ratio (especially in Norway and Switzerland) is but a fraction of America's. Same within the USA, States and cities with rigid gun control laws have the highest ratios of gun crime.
The 80/20 rule applies: Analysis of race-delineated gun deaths shows that approximately 80% of White killers kill themselves while the ratio is reversed for black killers.
Gun deaths are actually declining: Despite the opportunistic hysteria that accompanies every mass killing in the USA the number of gun deaths there has actually declined since the nineties. (Last year 12 per 100,000, 15 for most of the nineties...a 20% decline). Now apparently enhanced surgical skills (plenty of practice!) represent an important factor in the reduction. But the fact is that gun deaths are less of a problem now than they were twenty years ago.
The nigger in the woodpile: An appropriate metaphor here because the mystery ingredient underpinning all of the anomalies above is race. As FBI statistics show, year after year, blacks murder at about six times the rate of Whites, Hispanics three to four times the White rate. If you normalise the figures, i.e. isolate the ratio of gun murders committed by Whites, you'll see that America is little different from most European countries.
It should be clear therefore - even to a sociology professor - that the whole gun control project is based on false assumptions and contradictory data. The measures proposed are heavily skewed to disarm law-abiding Whites while making little or no impact on the overall gun murder rate. So it's totally misdirected and count-productive.
Or is it?
I ask because the gun control project in America is absolutely dominated by Jewish interest groups*. And why would Jews be so hostile to private gun ownership? After all, seeing as they portray themselves - ad nauseam - as hapless hard-working victims of pogroms throughout history you'd imagine they'd welcome the chance to arm themselves. In explanation I offer my Iron Law Of White Goyim Shafting. This law states the following: "If organised Jewry is lock-step in unison behind a given measure the ultimate objective of that measure is to shaft the White goyim".
Check it out. Works every time, as consistent as Newton's Law of Gravity or Mendel's Law of Independent Assortment.
As an explanation for this apparent paradox I offer the experience of colonialism. Understand that every colonial power assigned top priority to disarming the colonised population. The British Empire expended enormous amounts of blood, treasure and a variety of tactics (carrots, sticks, deception) in separating the natives from their arms. Am I uncharitable in suggesting that Jews regard America as colonised territory, a territory in which their position relative to the general population is analogous to that of - for example - Whites in Kenya under colonialism? The nightmare scenario for the settler there was the prospect of being surrounded by well-armed Kikuyu or Masai tribesmen. Which explains why West Bank settlers are armed to the teeth day and night. (A practice with which Feinstein, Schumer, Schiff et al seem to have no difficulty.) So maybe in the fevered imagination of Jewish gun control advocates White Christians represent the natives outside the compound poised to blow them away at the first opportunity.
In that case if you are the Government doesn't it make sense for guns to be controlled by the Government?
* The Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility represents a virtual who's who of leading "American" Jewish organisations supporting gun control including: "The Anti-Defamation League, Bet Alef, Congregation Beth Shalom, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, Jewish Family Service, Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle, Kavana Cooperative, Kol HaNeshamah, National Council of Jewish Women, Stroum Jewish Community Center, Temple Beth Am, Temple Beth Hatfiloh, Temple Beth Or, Temple B’Nai Torah, Temple De Hirsch Sinai, Tikvah Chadashah, Herzl Ner Tamid, Temple Beth El and the Washington State Holocaust Education Resource Center."