I'm well aware that the majority on this site have little time for professional sport, seeing it - correctly - as the exemplar par excellence of the bread and circuses strategy to keep White proles dumb and quiescent. But if like me you've been a fervid fan all your life this belated realisation isn't enough to switch off the interest. And actually it's not necessarily a bad thing as it enables you to keep a close eye on some of our enemy's activities.
One such activity is the women's equality agenda. An agenda which of course has nothing to do with equality of opportunity, rather that of outcome. The current brouhaha about prize money in women's tennis exemplifies this. For the record I'm all in favour of equality in sport. To the winner the spoils and all that. In many ways sport represents the one true arbiter of ability. So I enthusiastically endorse the principle of joint male-female competitions. And you'd imagine that the dykes who run women's tennis would feel the same way. After all, this would finally enable them to validate their endless claims to be as good as their male counterparts.
But strangely they don't want this. Not at all. In fact they scream and holler and flee from the idea like it were the plague. Why? Because they are only too aware - as is anybody with even a passing interest in the sport - that under such a regime not a single woman would make it past the 1st round, obliterated by their male opponents. Over a matter of months even the best of them would percolate down in the joint rankings until they were all out of the top 200 and thus condemned to playing in Challenger events. The winners of such events might, if lucky, walk away with a cheque for $10,000. The rest, like their male equivalents now, would eke out a subsistence living, dining in cheap burger joints and sharing accommodation.
So you can understand their reluctance.
Same applies to other sports. There have been bitter complaints about women's soccer and rugby getting minimal coverage on TV and lack of corporate endorsements. Again I propose equality. Make all forms of football unisex. What would the sports look like after this revolutionary move? Why, exactly the same as they do now. Women wouldn't get within a donkey's roar of a top football or rugby team. And were the authorities to force "equality" like they do in business? Well, there are no HR Departments on the sports field. No sinecures. No safe zones. Failure to deliver gets cruelly exposed and ruthlessly punished.
So roll on sports equality. If as you say grrrllls you're as good as the men you'll now have the chance to prove it.
PS: It's worth propagating this meme because it ineluctably links to the broader employment domain 'equality' racket.
One such activity is the women's equality agenda. An agenda which of course has nothing to do with equality of opportunity, rather that of outcome. The current brouhaha about prize money in women's tennis exemplifies this. For the record I'm all in favour of equality in sport. To the winner the spoils and all that. In many ways sport represents the one true arbiter of ability. So I enthusiastically endorse the principle of joint male-female competitions. And you'd imagine that the dykes who run women's tennis would feel the same way. After all, this would finally enable them to validate their endless claims to be as good as their male counterparts.
But strangely they don't want this. Not at all. In fact they scream and holler and flee from the idea like it were the plague. Why? Because they are only too aware - as is anybody with even a passing interest in the sport - that under such a regime not a single woman would make it past the 1st round, obliterated by their male opponents. Over a matter of months even the best of them would percolate down in the joint rankings until they were all out of the top 200 and thus condemned to playing in Challenger events. The winners of such events might, if lucky, walk away with a cheque for $10,000. The rest, like their male equivalents now, would eke out a subsistence living, dining in cheap burger joints and sharing accommodation.
So you can understand their reluctance.
Same applies to other sports. There have been bitter complaints about women's soccer and rugby getting minimal coverage on TV and lack of corporate endorsements. Again I propose equality. Make all forms of football unisex. What would the sports look like after this revolutionary move? Why, exactly the same as they do now. Women wouldn't get within a donkey's roar of a top football or rugby team. And were the authorities to force "equality" like they do in business? Well, there are no HR Departments on the sports field. No sinecures. No safe zones. Failure to deliver gets cruelly exposed and ruthlessly punished.
So roll on sports equality. If as you say grrrllls you're as good as the men you'll now have the chance to prove it.
PS: It's worth propagating this meme because it ineluctably links to the broader employment domain 'equality' racket.